Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reflecting ordinal"

From Cantor's Attic
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "==Reflecting a conjunctand down== A property that seems important about reflection is that for any $\Pi_n$-definable class $X$, being $\Pi_n$-reflection on Ord and in $X$ impl...")
 
(re)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Reflecting a conjunctand down==
 
==Reflecting a conjunctand down==
 
A property that seems important about reflection is that for any $\Pi_n$-definable class $X$, being $\Pi_n$-reflection on Ord and in $X$ implies being $\Pi_n$-reflecting on $X$. For example, if an ordinal is $\Pi_2$-reflecting and a limit of admissibles, it's also $\Pi_2$-reflecting on the class of limits of admissibles. But I don't know how to add this to the article, since although I've seen a proof I've never seen a published proof [[User:C7X|C7X]] ([[User talk:C7X|talk]]) 22:10, 30 May 2022 (PDT)
 
A property that seems important about reflection is that for any $\Pi_n$-definable class $X$, being $\Pi_n$-reflection on Ord and in $X$ implies being $\Pi_n$-reflecting on $X$. For example, if an ordinal is $\Pi_2$-reflecting and a limit of admissibles, it's also $\Pi_2$-reflecting on the class of limits of admissibles. But I don't know how to add this to the article, since although I've seen a proof I've never seen a published proof [[User:C7X|C7X]] ([[User talk:C7X|talk]]) 22:10, 30 May 2022 (PDT)
 +
: I added my own argumentation about [[ZFC#Uncountable_transitive_models|uncountable transitive models]], so if you know a proof, writing it is better than what I did. [[User:BartekChom|BartekChom]] ([[User talk:BartekChom|talk]]) 11:06, 3 June 2022 (PDT)

Revision as of 11:06, 3 June 2022

Reflecting a conjunctand down

A property that seems important about reflection is that for any $\Pi_n$-definable class $X$, being $\Pi_n$-reflection on Ord and in $X$ implies being $\Pi_n$-reflecting on $X$. For example, if an ordinal is $\Pi_2$-reflecting and a limit of admissibles, it's also $\Pi_2$-reflecting on the class of limits of admissibles. But I don't know how to add this to the article, since although I've seen a proof I've never seen a published proof C7X (talk) 22:10, 30 May 2022 (PDT)

I added my own argumentation about uncountable transitive models, so if you know a proof, writing it is better than what I did. BartekChom (talk) 11:06, 3 June 2022 (PDT)