Difference between revisions of "Talk:ZFC"

From Cantor's Attic
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
I think it should be sufficient merely to add a section for ZF at the bottom. [[User:Jdh|JDH]] 04:41, 21 January 2012 (PST)
 
I think it should be sufficient merely to add a section for ZF at the bottom. [[User:Jdh|JDH]] 04:41, 21 January 2012 (PST)
 +
 +
Regarding the rest of this page, I would prefer that the axioms are stated in plain language, in keeping with the style guidelines mentioned in the community portal. The fact that the axioms can be written out in the language of set theory is an incidental point, rather than the main point. [[User:Jdh|JDH]] 04:46, 21 January 2012 (PST)

Revision as of 05:46, 21 January 2012

Should there be different entries for ZF and ZFC? --Asafk 03:59, 21 January 2012 (PST)

I think it should be sufficient merely to add a section for ZF at the bottom. JDH 04:41, 21 January 2012 (PST)

Regarding the rest of this page, I would prefer that the axioms are stated in plain language, in keeping with the style guidelines mentioned in the community portal. The fact that the axioms can be written out in the language of set theory is an incidental point, rather than the main point. JDH 04:46, 21 January 2012 (PST)