# Difference between revisions of "User blog:Zetapology/K(L)"

Zetapology (Talk | contribs) (Added K(L); more to be edited) |
Zetapology (Talk | contribs) m (For any transitive class $W$ and any $\alpha$, $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$ is a transitive class.) |
||

Line 11: | Line 11: | ||

=== Loose Meaning === | === Loose Meaning === | ||

− | $\mathcal{T}_\alpha$ is a function on a class (generally transitive) $W$ such that $W \subseteq\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$. For almost every transitive class $W$, $\mathcal{T}(W)$, which is the union of all $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$, is $V$. However, this is not the case when $W$ is a transitive almost universal class. It is a generalization of $V_\alpha$ to all classes. For any class $W$ and any $\alpha | + | $\mathcal{T}_\alpha$ is a function on a class (generally transitive) $W$ such that $W \subseteq\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$. For almost every transitive class $W$, $\mathcal{T}(W)$, which is the union of all $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$, is $V$. However, this is not the case when $W$ is a transitive almost universal class. It is a generalization of $V_\alpha$ to all classes. For any transitive class $W$ and any $\alpha$, $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$ is a transitive class. |

$\mathrm{K}(W)$ is a function on a transitive class $W$ that measures how "close" it is to $V$. Interestingly, as stated above, there are transitive $W$ which are very close to $V$ (i.e. almost universal) yet their "distance" from $V$ does not exist because $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)=W$ for every $\alpha$. These cases should not be considered when using this function as they are indisputably outliers. | $\mathrm{K}(W)$ is a function on a transitive class $W$ that measures how "close" it is to $V$. Interestingly, as stated above, there are transitive $W$ which are very close to $V$ (i.e. almost universal) yet their "distance" from $V$ does not exist because $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)=W$ for every $\alpha$. These cases should not be considered when using this function as they are indisputably outliers. |

## Revision as of 22:14, 9 October 2017

## Contents

## $\mathrm{K}(W)$ and $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$

### Definition

For a class $W$:

- $\mathcal{T}_0(W)=W$
- $\mathcal{T}_{\alpha+1}(W)=\{x\in V:x\subseteq\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)\}\cup\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$
- $\mathcal{T}_\beta(W)=\bigcup_{\alpha<\beta}\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$ for limit ordinals $\beta$
- $\mathrm{K}(W)=\min\{\alpha:\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)=V\}$

### Loose Meaning

$\mathcal{T}_\alpha$ is a function on a class (generally transitive) $W$ such that $W \subseteq\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$. For almost every transitive class $W$, $\mathcal{T}(W)$, which is the union of all $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$, is $V$. However, this is not the case when $W$ is a transitive almost universal class. It is a generalization of $V_\alpha$ to all classes. For any transitive class $W$ and any $\alpha$, $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)$ is a transitive class.

$\mathrm{K}(W)$ is a function on a transitive class $W$ that measures how "close" it is to $V$. Interestingly, as stated above, there are transitive $W$ which are very close to $V$ (i.e. almost universal) yet their "distance" from $V$ does not exist because $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(W)=W$ for every $\alpha$. These cases should not be considered when using this function as they are indisputably outliers.

## The $\mathrm{K}(L)\geq\alpha$ Axioms

$\mathrm{K}(L)$ is an interesting subject. Assuming $V=L$, $\mathrm{K}(L)=0$. Interestingly, $\mathrm{K}(L)\neq n$ for any finite number $n>0$.

It could be stated as an axiom that $\mathrm{K}(L)\geq\alpha$; with $\mathrm{K}(L)\geq 1\Leftrightarrow 0^{\#}$. The axiom that $\mathrm{K}(L)$ does not exist should be called **The Axiom of Total Inconstructibility (ATI)**.

## Known Facts

Here are a list of known facts about $\mathrm{K}(L)$ and $\mathcal{T}_\alpha(L)$:

- $V_{\omega+\alpha}\subset\mathcal{T}_\alpha(L)$
- $\mathrm{K}(L)=0\Leftrightarrow$ $V=L$
- $\mathrm{K}(L)\neq\alpha+1$ for any $\alpha$
- $\mathrm{K}(L)=\omega$

(This article is to be edited when more facts are known about $\mathrm{K}(L)$).